2007 The Deadliest Year in Iraq

The US military leadership announced a steep drop in the rate of American deaths in October. That month, 38 American service members died in Iraq, the lowest monthly tally since March 2006, according to the Iraq Coalition Casualty Count (icasualties.org), an independent Web site that tracks military deaths. November’s total, if the current pace continues, would be higher, but still below the war’s average of 69 American military deaths per month.



Despite the decline, American commanders acknowledged that 2007 would be far deadlier than the second-worst year, 2004, when 849 Americans died, many of them in major battles for control of insurgent strongholds like Falluja.

Military officials attribute the increase this year to an expanded troop presence during the so-called surge, which swelled the American force to more than 165,000 troops in Iraq, and sent units out of large bases and into more dangerous communities.

Commanders contend that despite the cost in terms of lives lost, the strategy has improved security in the country and created a “tactical momentum” that could stabilize Iraq permanently.

I truly hope so.

The "Surge" is working?

Firstly, if less of our brave soldiers, sailors and airmen are being killed: Thank God. We hear that the "Surge" in Iraq is "working". But frankly I am not convinced. What does "working" mean exactly?

That the level of violence has dropped from horrific to merely intolerable?

That in the deadliest year of the war to date we have seen a drop in fatalities?



I am glad that President Bush finally started taking the war seriously - not just as a politocal statement (and oil-grab) but as a military campaign. If he and the admiinistration had listened to General Shinseki we would not have gotten in to this situation. (Even better, if the Bush administration had been more diligent in the search for information on WMD's, we might never have invaded). The ultimiate "slacker" President was finally spurred into action.

A few things though - much of the much-vaunted success (in El-Anbar, for example)

It goes without saying that US Forces are doing an amazing job. Let's remember that the job - as Republicans admit - is POLITICAL. We aren't out of the woods yet.

Oh and by the way, the current estimate for the cost of the war is $3,000,000,000,000.

What could we have bought for this?